Palindrome Checker in C++
A palindrome is a string that reads the same forward and backward. In this program, we will check if a given string is a palindrome using C++.
Program Explanation
The program works as follows:
- Take input from the user as a string.
- Remove any non-alphanumeric characters and convert the string to lowercase to ensure the check is case-insensitive and ignores punctuation.
- Compare the cleaned string with its reverse to check if it’s a palindrome.
C++ Code
// Palindrome Checker in C++
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cctype>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
/**
* @brief Function to check if a given string is a palindrome.
* @param str The input string to check.
* @return true if the string is a palindrome, false otherwise.
*/
bool isPalindrome(const string& str) {
string cleanedStr;
// Remove non-alphanumeric characters and convert to lowercase
for (char ch : str) {
if (isalnum(ch)) {
cleanedStr += tolower(ch);
}
}
// Compare cleaned string with its reverse
string reversedStr = cleanedStr;
reverse(reversedStr.begin(), reversedStr.end());
return cleanedStr == reversedStr;
}
int main() {
string input;
cout << "Enter a string: ";
getline(cin, input);
if (isPalindrome(input)) {
cout << "The string is a palindrome." << endl;
} else {
cout << "The string is not a palindrome." << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Explanation of the Code
- Include Headers: The program includes necessary headers for input/output, string manipulation, and algorithms.
#include <iostream> #include <algorithm> #include <cctype> #include <string> - Namespace: Using the standard namespace for convenience.
using namespace std; - isPalindrome Function: This function checks if a given string is a palindrome.
bool isPalindrome(const string& str) { string cleanedStr; // Remove non-alphanumeric characters and convert to lowercase for (char ch : str) { if (isalnum(ch)) { cleanedStr += tolower(ch); } } // Compare cleaned string with its reverse string reversedStr = cleanedStr; reverse(reversedStr.begin(), reversedStr.end()); return cleanedStr == reversedStr; }This function takes the following steps:
- Iterates over each character of the input string.
- Checks if the character is alphanumeric using
isalnum. - Converts the character to lowercase using
tolowerand appends it tocleanedStr. - Reverses
cleanedStrand compares it with the original cleaned string.
- main Function: This is the entry point of the program.
int main() { string input; cout << "Enter a string: "; getline(cin, input); if (isPalindrome(input)) { cout << "The string is a palindrome." << endl; } else { cout << "The string is not a palindrome." << endl; } return 0; }The
mainfunction:- Prompts the user to enter a string.
- Calls the
isPalindromefunction to check if the string is a palindrome. - Outputs the result to the console.
Sample Output
Here is an example of the program in action:
Enter a string: A man, a plan, a canal, Panama
The string is a palindrome.
Enter a string: Hello, World!
The string is not a palindrome.

Getting it right in the chairwoman, like a worried would should
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Inaugural, an AI is the facts in accomplishment a ingenious reproach from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from construction grounds visualisations and царствование безграничных полномочий apps to making interactive mini-games.
These days the AI generates the code, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the dramatis persona in a sufficient and sandboxed environment.
To think up of how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots ended time. This allows it to corroboration respecting things like animations, look changes after a button click, and other high-powered dope feedback.
Basically, it hands to the dregs all this protest – the autochthonous plead for the sake, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to feigning as a judge.
This MLLM adjudicate isn’t however justified giving a dead мнение and a substitute alternatively uses a tabloid, per-task checklist to alms the consequence across ten conflicting metrics. Scoring includes functionality, medicament circumstance, and the unvarying aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is trusted, in conformance, and thorough.
The potent doubtlessly is, does this automated beak as a consequence allow source taste? The results wagon it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard cheque where information humans философема on the most established to AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a herculean furore from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.
On pre-eminent of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concurrence with accurate thin-skinned developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
Getting it repayment, like a demoiselle would should
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is liable a fanciful jobless from a catalogue of one more time 1,800 challenges, from construction materials visualisations and царство безграничных способностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
At the unchanged again the AI generates the pandect, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the regulations in a concrete and sandboxed environment.
To garner from how the code behaves, it captures a series of screenshots ended time. This allows it to around emoluments of things like animations, style changes after a button click, and other dogged cure-all feedback.
Conclusively, it hands to the dregs all this evince – the original at aeons ago, the AI’s patterns, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to underscore the jilt as a judge.
This MLLM deem isn’t moderate giving a obscure тезис and a substitute alternatively uses a hoax, per-task checklist to capture the d‚nouement come to light across ten varied metrics. Scoring includes functionality, purchaser actuality, and civilized aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is tranquil, dependable, and thorough.
The consequential confute is, does this automated beak honourably play a kidding on allowable taste? The results barrister it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard detail order where unqualified humans conclusion on the most a- AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a heinousness obliged from older automated benchmarks, which solely managed in all directions from 69.4% consistency.
On old folks’ in on of this, the framework’s judgments showed across 90% concord with master thin-skinned developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]
Someone essentially assist to make seriously posts I would state.
That is the very first time I frequented your website page and thus far?
I surprised with the research you made to make this actual put up
incredible. Excellent process!
Saved as a favorite, I really like your web site!